Talk:Grammy Award for Best Disco Recording/Archive 1

GA nomination

edit

The article is short, but so was the award's lifespan. My latest Wikipedia project is getting Grammy Award categories to FL status (ten successful promotions so far, with two undergoing review). This category, however, would certainly not qualify for FL status. I believe it meets criteria for Good status, despite its length. I am hoping reviewers are satisfied with the amount of background information--I tried not to go overboard with the Disco Demolition Night information as this seems best suited in the article for the event itself. See peer review for additional feedback. --Another Believer (Talk) 16:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
This review is transcluded from Talk:Grammy Award for Best Disco Recording/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:17, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

How interesting, a Grammy with only one winner. I was going to quick-fail this and send you to FLC before I actually read it :).

Hah! --Another Believer (Talk) 04:45, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Not too many complaints:

  • "During 1973–1974..." per WP:YEAR this should be 1973–74
Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 04:45, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • "Da Ya Think I'm Sexy?" is missing a closing "
Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 04:45, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Allmusic and Billboard needs their publishers
Done. --Another Believer (Talk) 04:45, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Overall, very well written and incredibly interesting (or maybe it's just me, as I wasn't born when disco was big :P). Adabow (talk · contribs) 04:35, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! --Another Believer (Talk) 04:45, 12 November 2010 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.