Talk:Government Botanical Garden
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The proper name for this garden is Government Botanical Garden. Imc 10:13, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Very good article, help with finding more sources, but should have different page name
editThis is a handsome creation about a beautiful place--a real addition to Wikipedia. I came here after seeing your request for feedback at WP:FEED. It has a lot of good web-based sources already, but you can find 34 sources (for example) in Google Books using this tool:
- Searching for "Ooty botanical" Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Wikipedia prefers article titles to use the subject's common name (e.g. Bill Clinton) when it differs from the official name (e.g. William Jefferson Clinton). I see that Ooty Botanical Garden redirects here. Would you object to making that "Ooty Botanical Garden" name of this article and having "Government Botanical Gardens, Udagamandalam" redirect to that page? Sharktopustalk 21:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for taking time for the feedback. Either I have used up most of the sources or I am not able to find them now. I'll work on it. As for the name change, I would prefer to see the article with the present name. Also someone has already tried changing the name to Ooty Botanical Gardens, but it was reverted (see here). --Suraj (talk) 04:29, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- You reverted it yourself, didn't you? I will not change the name away from what you want; I am not so experienced myself as to be confident that the change is needed. It sounds like a wonderful place. Sharktopustalk 04:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- I tried reverting when i found out that the page was reverted back once. I tried finding the reasons for that and it seemed to me that the name Government Botanical Gardens, Udagamandalam suited it better.--Suraj T 07:09, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
year
edit'laid out in 1848' -the site reference for this statemaet is giving the year as 1847. The info box of this article is also giving the opening year as 1847. Which one is correct, 1847 or 1848? --Booradleyp1 (talk) 06:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Government Botanical Gardens, Ooty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110114053740/http://www.nilgiris.tn.gov.in/ooty.htm to http://www.nilgiris.tn.gov.in/ooty.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605143426/http://www.india-tourist-places.com/category/states-of-south-india/page/3/ to http://www.india-tourist-places.com/category/states-of-south-india/page/3/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100102141414/http://scstsenvis.nic.in/envis/new_page_53.htm to http://scstsenvis.nic.in/envis/new_page_53.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://nilgirislive.com/nlnilpointerest.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110115125521/http://www.nilgiris.tn.gov.in/FLOWER_SHOW.htm to http://www.nilgiris.tn.gov.in/flower_show.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110114053740/http://www.nilgiris.tn.gov.in/ooty.htm to http://www.nilgiris.tn.gov.in/ooty.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:12, 23 March 2017 (UTC)