Talk:Going Clear (film)/GA1
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Matthew R Dunn in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn (talk · contribs) 18:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'll be reviewing this article. -- Matthew RD 18:58, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
- 1. Well written? No issues that are apparent to me here. It does seem well written. Well done.
- 2. Verifiable?
- 3. Broad in coverage?
- 4. Neutral? Got all sides of the issues, including positive reviews with some negative critiques in it, and responses from the church, no matter how bonkers it might be.
- 5. Stable? No recent edit conflicts, or at all.
- 6. Images?
Notes
edit- I hear the doc is getting seven Emmy nominations. Perhaps there should be a mention of this.
- Cites #23 and #42 don't have a publisher on the templates.
- "The church complained that Gibney had declined to interview 25 of its members whom it had put forward to him.[7] According to Gibney, Miscavige, Travolta, and Cruise all declined interviews and the church instead offered "a delegation of 25 unidentified individuals, presumably to smear the people in our film", which did not interest him.[37]" The Miscavige, Travolta and Cruise declining interviews bit is not supported by cite #37, but it is supported by cite #7.
Overall just some nit picky things, but impressive article overall. I will give you seven days, but I doubt it would even take one, after which I will pass this. -- Matthew RD 21:32, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Matthew R Dunn: Sorry about the slight delay in completing this, but it should all be done now. Prioryman (talk) 10:11, 25 July 2015 (UTC)