Talk:Go Farther in Lightness/GA1

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Marcostev88 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:19, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):  
    b. (citations to reliable sources):  
    c. (OR):  
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):  
    b. (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:  

(Criteria marked   are unassessed)

This is quite an old nomination for the GAN backlog! --K. Peake 08:19, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • The exact release date needs to be sourced in the body as 18th August
  • Same for the recording months
  • Sony Music Studios, Sydney → Sony Music, Sydney
  • The lead is quite disordered at the moment; the first sentence should be followed by the info currently in the second para, then reception and awards followed by commercial performance and legacy
  • "It debuted at number one" → "The album debuted at number one"
  • Mention it was certified platinum in Australia and by the Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA)
  • "the album won four awards" → "four awards were won by Gang of Youths"
  • "Go Farther in Lightness's lyrics focus" → "its lyrics focus"
  • "bleakness and triumph,"" → "bleakness and triumph"," per MOS:QUOTE
  • Shouldn't the tour be mentioned by name in the lead?
  • "where three tracks from the album placed" → "where three other tracks placed"
  • "was critically acclaimed by reviewers and" → "was acclaimed by music critics and"
  • "It topped the annual" → "A top position was achieved the annual"
  • "and two of its tracks featured" → "and two of the tracks featured"

Background edit

  • Add the "I don't think" part to end the frontman's quote
  • Where is the EP release sourced in relation to his quote?
  • No visa complications are sourced

Composition edit

  • I think swapping these sub-sections would make for the correct order

Lyricism edit

  • "something you love,"" → "something you love"," per MOS:QUOTE – these are throughout when you have punctuation inside quotes at unsuitable points
  • Where are the recurring themes sourced?
  • Pipe soul to Human spirit

Production and recording edit

  • Wikilink Darlinghurst to itself
  • Avoid any usage of claim per WP:CLAIM
  • Audio sample looks good!
  • I have noticed more MOS:QUOTE issues in this sub-section, as I explained for the other one
  • "interludes for the album" → "interludes for Go Farther in Lightness"
  • The interpolation is not sourced

Release edit

  • Retitle to Release and promotion
  • Wikilink David Le'aupepe on the img text
  • The release date is sourced as 9 February with no music video, mention this was the lead single from Go Father in Lightness too
  • "They would later perform" → "Gang of Youths would later perform"
  • The ARIA position needs a source and the link should be to ARIA Charts
  • "was released on 26 July" → "was released on 26 July 2017"
  • The sixth and final single is not sourced
  • Remove wikilink on Australian Albums Chart and this needs to be sourced; if not, change the information
  • Reword the certification sentence to saying the album was certified in Australia by the Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA) with the number of copies

Tour edit

  • "made their United States TV" → "made their US TV" per MOS:US
  • "The band toured" → "Gang of Youths toured"
  • "They performed for" → "The band performed for"

Critical reception edit

  • "received widespread critical acclaim." → "was met with widespread critical acclaim from music critics."
  • "calling it "a remarkable" → "calling the record "a remarkable"
  • MOS:QWQ issues again
  • "called the album "a" → "called Go Farther in Lightness "a"
  • Remove pipe on The Music

Legacy edit

  • "has been featured in" → "has led to rankings in" and end the sentence here, starting a new one for RS
  • "It also topped" → "The album also topped"
  • The Powderfinger, Chet Faker and 200 parts are not sourced
  • "Further, two more songs featured" → "Furthermore, two songs featured"
  • "has become the band's" → "has become Gang of Youth's"
  • Remove the 95 million part since it's not sourced
  • Table looks good!

Track listing edit

  • Good

Personnel edit

  • Good

Charts edit

  • Good

Certifications edit

  • Good

See also edit

  • Good

References edit

  • Cite Triple J as the sole publisher for all those refs and only wikilink on ref 6
  • Remove the publisher from refs 3, 13 and 49
  • Wikilink Music Feeds only on ref 4
  • Remove or replace ref 15 per WP:RSSM
  • What is ref 16 and why is it reliable?
  • Ref 18 is a duplicate of ref 4
  • Wikilink Dropbox and move to via with Australian Recording Industry Association as publisher on ref 25
  • What exactly makes refs 27 and 31 reliable sources?
  • Wikilink Renowned for Sound on ref 40
  • WP:OVERLINK of The Music on ref 47
  • Cite Double J as publisher instead and remove Australian Broadcasting Corporation on ref 49
  • Ref 52 is a duplicate of ref 42

Final comments and verdict edit

  •   On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this is a bit messy but good luck! --K. Peake 19:08, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Hey @Kyle Peake, I believe I've made all the suggested edits. Thanks so much for the feedback! Marcostev88 (talk) 13:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
    Marcostev88 You still need to get rid of the duplicate RS ref as I pointed out. --K. Peake 07:04, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
    @Kyle Peake fixed— sorry about that. Marcostev88 (talk) 15:38, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
     Pass now, well done on picking up quickly on the remaining problem! --K. Peake 16:48, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
    @Kyle Peake Thanks for the review, appreciate your time! Marcostev88 (talk) 01:04, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply