 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gilbert's potoroo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090615231658/http://www.dec.wa.gov.au/science-and-research/animal-research/gilbert-s-potoroo.html to http://www.dec.wa.gov.au/science-and-research/animal-research/gilbert-s-potoroo.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060906132200/http://deh.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/recovery/p-gilbertii/pubs/p-gilbertii.pdf to http://www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/recovery/p-gilbertii/pubs/p-gilbertii.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
revert edit
Hi @Dl2000: I got an edit conflict with you, but found it easier to save out my progress. When I came to restore your edits I saw a fact tag and message about template damage. The fact tag can be put back, but you can assume I will address that as I try to untangle and improve the article (this is generally what I do :). Regarding the damage, I deliberately removed the templates at the top. That is not okay, they are compulsory? I don't see a need, but I will put them back if it is an improvement. cygnis insignis 12:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)