Talk:Georgios Samaras/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Grandiose in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grandiose (talk · contribs) 09:53, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Review edit

Generally good, a few small things:

  • Check any edits I make in copyediting.
  • Please provide retrieval dates for web references (you've got a lot done, but there are many more).
  • Ref #78 needs fixing. (Other references' formatting is inconsistent, {{cite web}} would help but this isn't a GA criterion. Caps should be avoided, and the same site is regularly referenced a different way.)
  • Ref #116 needs more information; refs #117 and #118 are the same.
  • Images are all fine (although File:PA110119Samaras.jpg is pretty poor quality-wise).
  • A couple of citations needed where indicated.
  • Source check:
  • Article: "However, after his move to Celtic, Samaras was more open to playing as a left midfielder. The Daily Mail said that this was because he was happier at Celtic and more willing to be a team player."
  • Source: "Against Feyenoord, Samaras was deployed wide left as Strachan again tinkered with his system but, after that unhappy spell at Manchester City, the 23-year-old is happy to play anywhere for the common good."
Conclusion: Fine.

Not much to do here. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 09:53, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Just a note the sources for the two cns you added are in the next paragraph. Also I'm afraid a lot of the refs aren't done by me (I always use the same citenews template) and aren't fromatted as I'd like. Should I add the accesdate as now for the ones that don't already have it. I also fixed the two refs you pointed out and did a minor ce. Adam4267 (talk) 13:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
You should check the webpage still exists and says what it ought to; then today's accessdate would be accurate. It's supposed to be the last day the webpage definitely verified the information given, think of it like that. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 13:28, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
All refs now formatted properly. Adam4267 (talk) 15:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Found some good pics on commons. Will add them later tonight. Adam4267 (talk) 16:01, 19 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Photographs are fine. Do remember to address the citation needed tags, though. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 15:17, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply