Talk:Geographia Neoteriki/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Two images of the cover and a section cover provided and captioned, so the article is illustrated.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I'm awarding this article GA-status. On the whole it is GA-compliant, but I was beginning to have some concerns over Wikipedia:Plagiarism. The sources were "acknowledged" by citation; however, they were direct quotations of parts of sentences, but were not "marked" as such by quotation marks. Please be careful.

Congratulations on producing an informative article. Pyrotec (talk) 16:48, 20 February 2011 (UTC)