Talk:Genetically modified wheat

edit by 68.5.171.110

68.5.171.110 added the following content in this dif: "in a clear conflict of interest for which a valid assessment should be legitimately made through an entirely independent unbiased agency, however." I reverted in this dif with edit note, "revert unsourced" The IP added it back in this dif with edit note "Proper unbiased testing requires an independent method. This fact requires no reference. Please explain your reason for removal.)". I reverted again and am opening this discussion. WP:VERIFY is a Wikipedia policy. Everything requires a reference. Please also see WP:SOAPBOX (also Wikipedia policy) Jytdog (talk) 13:03, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for keeping wikipedia about the facts. --Magosgruss (talk) 20:52, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Gerald Nelson and Green Revolution

This article treats Gerald Nelson's views on a 1st, 2nd, and 3rd green revolution as truth. The reference supports only the presentation of this view as belonging to Nelson; in any case, discussion of what constitutes a green revolution is largely outside of the scope of wheat as a subject. This content would fit better into Agricultural Revolution, or possibly Green Revolution, where there is more context and space given to other views of the concept of a 'green revolution'.Dialectric (talk) 03:05, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Genetically modified wheat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130120062702/http://www.theitem.com:80/unknown/article_2e853b5d-cbf1-554b-86ba-6726e3ce1fa7.html to http://www.theitem.com/unknown/article_2e853b5d-cbf1-554b-86ba-6726e3ce1fa7.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120301195658/http://www.agroscope.admin.ch/biosicherheit/04186/index.html?lang=en to http://www.agroscope.admin.ch/biosicherheit/04186/index.html?lang=en
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120308124254/http://cera-gmc.org/static/cropdb/112_US.html to http://cera-gmc.org/static/cropdb/112_US.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120110133906/http://www.non-gm-farmers.com/news_details.asp?ID=1352 to http://www.non-gm-farmers.com/news_details.asp?ID=1352
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111006070940/http://www.foodmanufacturing.com/scripts/ShowPR~RID~12434.asp to http://www.foodmanufacturing.com/scripts/ShowPR~RID~12434.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130922234211/http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2021104405_wheatexportxml.html to http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2021104405_wheatexportxml.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Resistance

Hello @HombrePluma: This text and [[glufosinate]] resistance.<ref name="HB4-FSANZ" /> is correct. I've checked the source a second time. Invasive Spices (talk) 22 September 2022 (UTC)