Talk:Gebeachan/GA1
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:00, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- No DABs, external links OK
- Image properly licensed
- ninth–twelfth-century What to do you mean by this? That it was composed sometime between the 9th and 12th centuries? If so, I'd suggest clarifying that by using "9th to 12th-century" or something similar.
- the Annals of Clonmacnoise clarify that this is a lost work.
- In fact, Gebeachan's attested title Not at all sure about this transition as there's no statement opposing the sentence.
- noted by Chronicon ex chronicis "the" Chronicon ex chronicis
- Amlaíb himself died 941 "in"
- Duplicate cite in #23
- In general, you only need to link to something on its first reference, unless you are linking to a different page or something. so there are a ton of duplicate links for the UCC and the Corpus of Electronic Texts, forex.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:58, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Sturmvogel 66. I think I've taken care of everything. I'm sorry for taking so long to tackle this. My eyes must have completely missed it on my watchlist. I really appreciate you that you left me a note on my talkpage.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 23:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- No trouble, especially since I was very slow to review it. Everything looks good.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:43, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Sturmvogel 66. I think I've taken care of everything. I'm sorry for taking so long to tackle this. My eyes must have completely missed it on my watchlist. I really appreciate you that you left me a note on my talkpage.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 23:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)