Talk:Gary Null/Archive 4
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
Questionable?
Hi guys, I have seen the policies attached to the talk page. However, I still think that the article could use with toning down the more emotive language and vague assertions. I agree that Null is somewhere between a kook and a scam artist. However, we should strive to made the article have a neutral tone. The fact is that Null is opposed to the scientific consesus and promotes dangerous treatments, so we should just report these facts. I am sure you get all sorts of motivated editors who do not know WP policies here and it must be tiring. But I ask you to assume good faith. Ok, I think it is best to work from edit to edit. Putting 'questionable' in the lede line doesn't strike me as useful. It is not a word with a clear medical or scientific meaning. Would 'dietary supplements with no proven medical benefit' be better? Ashmoo (talk) 10:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- It simply says the same thing in on word.Slatersteven (talk) 10:37, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I cannot parse your sentence. Could you clarify what you mean? Ashmoo (talk) 17:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
Rephrase for clarity
Hey guys
→he was speculated to have incurred the maximum revenues, in the history of the WBAI station, as it shut down in October 2019.[49]
This is not clear. Let's say he was speculated to have raised the most money for WBAI of any single person in its history.