Talk:Mount Gareloi/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 21:06, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Initial review

This article appears to be at or about the right level for a GA-class article.

Here are my initial comments:

• I'm not sure that History is a suitable title for the two sentences that it contains, particularly when there is another section called 'Eruptive history'. Perhaps 'Discovery' or 'Discovery of the island' might be a more apt title?

 Done.

• The page numbers quoted for the 'Coombs, McGimsey and Browne' in-line citations do not match what is in that paper. They might be pdf file page numbers, but they don't match the page numbers in the article.

My computer doesn't let me see those article numbers, I apologize. Would you mind adding them for me? Sorry to be a bother. ceranthor 16:33, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

OK, I was just about to do it and then I noticed your remark above.Pyrotec (talk) 16:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

 Done.Pyrotec (talk) 19:12, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

• Threat - This is much more 'woolly' than Coombs, McGimsey and Browne. I'm fairly certain that it is not an accurate summary of what they wrote (but I will be checking it).

I will get around to rewriting the section today. ceranthor 16:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Pyrotec (talk) 21:37, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

main review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A interesting topic on an isolate area.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Congratulations on the quality of the article, I'm awarding GA status.Pyrotec (talk) 21:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC)