Talk:Fur seal
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fur seal article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Kmorris2014.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:57, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled edit
The fur seal population has quadrupled in the past week. Footballfan190 (talk) 02:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Exploitation? edit
Exploitation seems non neutral as a title of a section given that it carries with it a strong negative connotation. I would think another word would be better. Anyone disagree?--Δζ (talk) 14:10, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- The term does sound rather negative but, well, slaughtering animals for their fur is a rather negative concept, don't you think? Or should we take down those pictures of the bloody slaughtered pigs and dolphins? We don't want people to see that kind of butchery in a negative light, do we? Saying that a species is "exploited" for something is pretty common, just as any resource is said to be "exploited", whether that be forests for lumber or mineral resources or what have you. It doesn't need to be sugar coated. 97.104.210.67 (talk) 00:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fur seal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121031025447/http://www.bas.ac.uk/documents/bas_bulletins/bulletin56_08.pdf to http://www.bas.ac.uk/documents/bas_bulletins/bulletin56_08.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Behavior and Ecology edit
I liked this section of the wiki article, because it was very informative and well written. However, you can include the locations of where the females seals go during their foraging trips (Coastal waters, upwelling zones?) for food for their pups. I'm just curious, since their foraging trips can last a week long. Kmorris2014 (talk) 00:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
Article contradicts itself edit
The disclaimer at the top says, "'Fur seal' is a common name that does not correspond to a single taxonomic unit", but the first sentence of the article says the term corresponds to the subfamily Arctocephalinae, which is a single taxonomic unit. —Mahāgaja · talk 17:34, 28 January 2023 (UTC)