Talk:Fructose 1-phosphate

Latest comment: 11 years ago by ZaciOne in topic Article needs review of links

Multiple questions about this record edit

Some comments: 1) The name has n stereochemistry 2) The name converts to the cyclic form 3) The PubCHem link is to the cyclic form http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary/summary.cgi?cid=717 4) Is there a WP:CHEM policy about sugars in linear, cyclized form? 5) The CAS number links to both linear and cyclic forms

Compare it to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fructose_1%2C6-bisphosphate which is cyclic--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 04:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Article needs review of links edit

Some information provided may already be written in links to other topics, where it may be more relevant. Someone should check the links and see if some information is repeated unnecessarily here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZaciOne (talkcontribs) 21:04, 24 March 2013 (UTC)Reply