Talk:French ironclad Océan/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Skinny87 (talk) 21:48, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   'Océan was a wooden-hulled, armored frigate built for the French Navy in the mid to late 1860s, the lead ship of her class.' - 'and the lead ship of her class'

   'Late in the ship's career four above-water 356-millimeter (14.0 in) torpedo tubes were added.' - Merge to previous paragraph to get rid of fragment sentence

   Done and done.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Do we know why she was recalled from the blockade?

   The entire squadron was recalled.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

A small article that would seem to be as comprehensive as it can be about a ship that essentially did very little. A few points and it can be passed. Skinny87 (talk) 08:42, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the review.