Talk:Frei Galvão/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: warrior4321 15:49, 20 July 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

   The lead needs to be expanded to summarize the contents of the article. It currently summarizes -nothing- from the body of the article.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Reference 4 and even reference 5 are used too many times. You need to find additional references to back up these claims. A single reference is not good enough.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Did he not write any books or have anything created by him?

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Prose review

• His father, Antônio Galvão de França, was the Portuguese-born Captain-General of the village. Active in the world of commerce, França belonged to the Third Order of Saint Francis and was known for his generosity. Was his father a priest or a soldier with high military rank, or was he both?

• by his father, which wished to provide Humanities and cultural training to his son. He followed his brother José, who was already studying there. Don't you mean who?

• Just when things seemed more quiet, another government intervention brought Galvão a further trial We don't write stories, please remove the just when things seemed more quiet.

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow folks to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns, and let me know one of those places when the issues have been addressed. If I may suggest that you strike out, check mark, or otherwise mark the items I've detailed, that will make it possible for me to see what's been addressed, and you can keep track of what's been done and what still needs to be worked on. warrior4321 02:08, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Since, no work was done on the article, I am failing this nomination. warrior4321 13:35, 31 July 2010 (UTC)