Talk:Fred Provo/GA1

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Gonzo fan2007 in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 15:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


I'll review this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 15:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  


Comments edit

  • wrote in selected Provo athlete of the year -> "selecting"
  • ultimately committed to the University of Washington. He majored in advertising at the school -> "Washington, where he majored in advertising."
  • before he was called to serve in World War II. was he drafted? Or is this a colloquialism? Either way, make it more objective ("before serving in World War II" or something like that)
  • He served in the Battle of the Bulge and parachuted as part of the Normandy landings and was awarded two Purple Hearts after having been wounded in service replace the first "and" with a comma.
  • Ref spot check: 3, 8, 12, 13, 16

Looks good, putting on hold. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 16:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.