Talk:Frémont Emancipation/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Historical Perspective in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 16:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC) Hi, I am reviewing this article and found it fascinating to read. I made some minor copy editing changes, which I hope you don't mind, to improve the flow and wording. Xtzou (Talk) 16:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:   Clearly and concisely written
    B. MoS compliance:   Complies with required elements of MoS
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:   Reliable sources
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:   Well referenced
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:   Sets the context
    B. Focused:   Remains focused on the topic
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: Pass!  

Congratulations! Very nice article. Xtzou (Talk) 17:02, 25 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Your review is very much appreciated. Best, Historical Perspective (talk) 19:30, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply