Talk:Fourth-generation programming language/Archives/2016
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Fourth-generation programming language. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fourth-generation programming language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110516121525/http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2002/1435/09/14350279.pdf&ei=pgcWQ6CwKsKYYMfF9OAI to http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2002/1435/09/14350279.pdf&ei=pgcWQ6CwKsKYYMfF9OAI
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090202154259/http://homepages.cwi.nl:80/~arie/papers/dslbib/ to http://homepages.cwi.nl/~arie/papers/dslbib/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
WTF
"A quantitative definition of 4GL has been set by Capers Jones, as part of his work on function point analysis. Jones defines the various generations of programming languages in terms of developer productivity, measured in function points per staff-month. A 4GL is defined as a language that supports 12–20 function points per staff month. This correlates with about 16–27 lines of code per function point implemented in a 4GL."
WTF am I reading? People get points for writing code now? 4GL allows you to get more points? Why is this a computer science article, please move to the pseudoscience or enterprise programming section.
"Fourth-generation languages have often been compared to domain-specific programming languages (DSLs). [[[!!!WTF???Some researchers state that 4GLs are a subset of DSLs.???WTF!!!]]]"
Bullshit.
- Yes, I know, and I agree with you. Both the references to support that statement about 4GLs being a subset of DSLs are dead. I removed the preceding sentence too, as it really doesn't make any sense. The section about Capers Jones and his points per staff-month was removed also.--FeralOink (talk) 19:17, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
Uh, I agree with the BS part, though it really seems these "4gl" are just DSL for statistical processing or SAP or, you know, domain-specific stuff like that. It seems almost as if being a real programming language with generic applicability is mutually exclusive with being "4gl". The whole 4gl concept seems like overly vague BS. It's simply too early to tell, history hasn't been played out yet. --Sigmundur (talk) 08:56, 21 November 2016 (UTC)