Talk:For My Woman/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

I will get on with this right away! --K. Peake 07:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Pipe 2UW Theatre to KIIS 106.5 in the infobox
• Remove Australian rock since that is not actually sourced as a genre
• Wikilink Stevie Wright to himself
• Remove overly obvious wikilink on Sydney
• The following being in clubs is not sourced
• "who liked the band enough to sign them to" → "who liked then enough to sign with"
• Pipe 2UW to KIIS 106.5
• "Musically "For My Woman", boasts clear influences from" → "Musically "For My Woman" is centered in" since this is the actual genre
• "on 18 March 1965 backed by" → "on 18 March 1965, backed by"
• Could you mention what retrospective critics praised about the song?

Background and composition

• Split into a Background and recording section and a Composition one rather than altogether, as they are both two paras
• Pipe 2UW to KIIS 106.5 on the img text
• "Sydney, Australia in 1964 by" → "Sydney, Australia in 1964, by"
• "they were never particularly influenced" → "the Easybeats were never particularly influenced"
• "an acquaintance of Vaughan." → "an acquaintance of his."
• Add a comma after Albert Productions
• "something the band were" → "something they were"
• Pipe 2UW to KIIS 106.5
• ""The Bells", "For My Woman" along with" → ""The Bells" and "For My Woman", along with"
• Add the release year of "I (Who Have Nothing)"
• "the group performed on" → "the Easybeats performed on"
• "contributing with lyrics while" → "contributing lyrics while"
• "pop trio Bee Gees." → "pop trio the Bee Gees."
• Pipe merseybeat to Beat music
• "from Pretty Thing's lead singer" → "from their lead singer"

Release and reception

• "his top-ten hit" → "his top-10 hit" per MOS:NUM
• "as the group's first single." → "as their first single."
• Remove wikilink on rhythm and blues
• "was reluctant to market it." → "was reluctant on marketing."
• Quote box looks good!
• "after their follow-up single" → "after the follow-up single"
• "a top-ten hit in" → "a top-10 hit in"
• "It fared particularly well" → "The song fared particularly well"
• ""Say That You're Mine" were excluded" → ""Say That You're Mine", was excluded"
• "one of the group's singles" → "one of their singles"
• "on that album." → "on the album."
• "was a "mid-paced" blues song" → "is a "mid-paced" blues song" with the wikilink
• "states that the song is" → "stated that the song is"
• "that it is a "Taut," → "that it is a "taut,"

Charts

• Good

References

• Copyvio score looks amazing at 8.3%!!!
• Archive these two URLs by using fix dead links
• Cite AllMusic as publisher instead on ref 25

Sources

• Good

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; that went very quickly! --K. Peake 08:46, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

  @Kyle Peake! It's a rather short article, meaning I should've fixed all of the points listed here. VirreFriberg (talk) 18:31, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

  ✓ Pass now, it was mostly fixed and I did some brief copy editing in any areas where there seemed to be slight misunderstandings! --K. Peake 09:43, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.