Talk:For Ann (rising)
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Jerome Kohl in topic For Ann Rising
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that one or more musical audio files be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and included in this article to improve its quality. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request. |
Books
edit- Tenney is the author of Meta (+) Hodos, one of, if not the, earliest applications of Gestalt theory and cognitive science to music, and later "Hierarchical temporal gestalt perception in music: a metric space model" with Larry Polansky, and other works, the influence of may be seen in many of his pieces including the twelve minute For Ann (rising).
The books give the context for For Ann (rising) within Tenney's works. I think this should be clarified and readded. Hyacinth 03:13, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Broken Links
editSome links at the bottom of this artical do not work. Since I have no expertise and an extremely basic understanding of internet I do not feel able to resolve this problem. 86.162.226.141 (talk) 10:59, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- the link is in fact broken — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.190.233.122 (talk) 1:07, 2 December 2008
- It is more than just broken, it is deliberately blocked by the site owner. The usual procedure in cases of broken links is to attempt to substitute an archived copy, using the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. When I attempted to do this, I got only the message: "We're sorry, access to http://www.allclassical.com/cg/acg.dll?p=acg&sql=2:477209 has been blocked by the site owner via robots.txt." I think the only option is to delete the link.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 18:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Further to the above, the Wikipedia article quotes from this source, which is why it was listed in the "References" section instead of "External links". With the loss of the source, the quotation would have to be removed as well. Fortunately, I have discovered the (copyrighted) original, and can make an appropriate substitution. Presumably it was copyright violation that prompted the Allclassical.com people to block access even to archived versions of that article.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 18:58, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- It looks like I was wrong about having found the source for the quotations. The two Grimshaw items I have added both refer to this piece, but neither of them has either of the two quotations offered in this article. I shall keep on trying, but in the meantime, if anyone else can find the source(s), please feel free to add it (them). If this cannot be done in a reasonable amount of time (say, two weeks), I think the quotations must be deleted.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 19:26, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Further to the above, the Wikipedia article quotes from this source, which is why it was listed in the "References" section instead of "External links". With the loss of the source, the quotation would have to be removed as well. Fortunately, I have discovered the (copyrighted) original, and can make an appropriate substitution. Presumably it was copyright violation that prompted the Allclassical.com people to block access even to archived versions of that article.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 18:58, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- It is more than just broken, it is deliberately blocked by the site owner. The usual procedure in cases of broken links is to attempt to substitute an archived copy, using the Internet Archive Wayback Machine. When I attempted to do this, I got only the message: "We're sorry, access to http://www.allclassical.com/cg/acg.dll?p=acg&sql=2:477209 has been blocked by the site owner via robots.txt." I think the only option is to delete the link.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 18:52, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
For Ann Rising
editFor those curious I was able to find this on iTunes and preview it. I'm not sure I would call it a song as much as a proof of concept. Sounds like a siren that's always going up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.186.57.206 (talk) 13:12, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
- Why would you expect it to be a "song"? The article certainly does not describe it as such.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 16:49, 11 October 2010 (UTC)