Talk:Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Tharsaile in topic Not As Clear as Old Man Down the Road page
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Case name edit
I am thinking of moving this article to Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., which is how the case is usually cited and referred to. Any thoughts? Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Flagging this again for any input. Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- There having been no objections (or interest at all), I've gone ahead and made the move, leaving a redirect. Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:27, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Not As Clear as Old Man Down the Road page edit
The page on the song, The Old Man Down the Road, is so succinct and clear, as it contains the passage,
"This case, Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., became precedent when the U.S. Supreme Court (1993) overturned lower court rulings and awarded attorneys' fees to Fogerty, without Fogerty having to show that Zaentz's original suit was frivolous."
This page, Fogerty vs. Fantasy, is longer but does it even directly state that Fogerty was awarded attorneys' fees? I read the whole thing twice and I don't think it does! tharsaile (talk) 14:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC)