Talk:Fluoroform

should its potent greenhouse gas properties and key role in Kyoto-organized Clean Development Mechanism be mentioned? see http://www.worldwatch.org/node/4634 148.85.196.144 01:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

NY Times, Dec 21, 2006 issue has this: The secretariat of the Clean Development Mechanism estimates that a ton of HFC-23 in the atmosphere has the same effect as 11,700 tons of carbon dioxide.

So I'm thinking HFC-23's potent greenhouse gas properties - "carbon dioxide equivalence" would be good to include on the page, but I'm not really qualified to give an accurate estimate.

Carbon dioxide equivalence is now included-- that's what the 100-yr Global Warming Potential indicates.Skamon (talk) 04:13, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Isn't this stuff highly reactive? That is, when released into the environment is does not last long enough to cause much greenhouse effect?

The atmospheric lifetime is 260 years, the ODP is 0.0 and the GWP is 12000. ("Refrigerant Data Summary" Engineered Systems, 18(11):74-88, November 2001) [USER: I] 19:40, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

fyi: different GWP's are sometimes quoted for HFC-23 because our understanding of this quantity has changed over time. A 100-yr GWP of 11700 is from the 2001 IPCC Report (Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis). The HFC-23 GWP was updated in the 2007 report to 14800. The UNFCCC still uses 11700, so that is why this number is often seen in literature today despite the science update. Skamon (talk) 04:13, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Patents

Leon Jerzy Belf - Production of Fluoroform 1960 2,946,827

Geir Bjornson- Production of Fluoroform 1969 3,439,052--Stone 22:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Banning HFC-23 recommendation resource

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-06/carbon-credits-becoming-junk-before-2013-ban-closes-door-energy-markets.html by Dinakar Sethuraman and Natalie Obiko Pearson Bloomberg.com Dec 6, 2011 1:02 PM ET

"HFC-23 (hydrofluorocarbon-23) and NO2 (nitrous oxide) are so damaging to the environment that they should be banned outright and not entitled to get emission credits, the EU and other governments have said. "

99.190.82.160 (talk) 07:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fluoroform. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061015041042/https://www.mathesontrigas.com/pdfs/msds/MAT09970.pdf to http://www.mathesontrigas.com/pdfs/msds/MAT09970.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:21, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Chemical Abstracts Report

11601 publications have appeared on fluoroform, 3534 since 2009. It is very difficult to cite primary sources well.--Smokefoot (talk) 12:12, 4 July 2019 (UTC)