Talk:Flight instructor

Clean-up tag removed. Articles on aviation regulation on Wikipedia are fraught with problems because each jurisdiction does things differently, and one particular jurisdiction has by far the largest share of aviators and first-language English-speakers, and they frequently tend to write articles in a non-globalized manner. HOWEVER, considering all this, this particular article isn't really that bad.BaseTurnComplete 22:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I think a section with JAA/ EASA definitions needs to be added as this represents one of the largest if not the largest Aerospace jusrisdiction — Preceding unsigned comment added by Williambrodie (talk • contribs) 17:22, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Flight instructor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100928185522/http://www.caa.govt.nz/Advisory_Circulars/AC61_18.pdf to http://www.caa.govt.nz/Advisory_Circulars/AC61_18.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120930033025/http://cfiacademy.com/courses/cfi-initial/what-are-the-eligibility-requirements-for-cfi-course/ to http://cfiacademy.com/courses/cfi-initial/what-are-the-eligibility-requirements-for-cfi-course/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Certified VS Certificated

This whole paragraph is stupid. Pilots love semantic arguments, but I think this whole section should be deleted in favor of simple parenthetical near the introduction... "A certificated flight instructor (also commonly referred to as a certified flight instructor) Yes, there is no such thing as a private pilot LICENSE, but who cares, that is the common vernacular. Pilots all think they are lawyers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.182.36.37 (talk) 09:06, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Not to be pedantic, but there is no such thing as a "certified flight instructor." Legally, that implies that the FAA certified the instructor as competent, and is therefore liable for any deficiencies in case of an untoward incident. To avoid this potential liability, the FAA is quite emphatic that the "certification" is done by a Designated Pilot Examiner. Once the DPE certifies the pilot as a competent instructor, the FAA issues a certificate, then the instructor becomes an FAA certificated pilot. That's a subtle but very important legal distinction. Flight instructors are never referred to as "certified flight instructors" except by people who are not conversant with aviation terminology.12.89.124.50 (talk) 22:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC)