| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fire challenge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Deletion edit
Is this really the sort of activity that should be included in an encyclopaedia? Surely giving it some 'authority' or 'endorsement' could lead the vulnerable/incredibly stupid to engage in this activity as if it's normal, sensible behaviour. This page should be deleted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.217.246.178 (talk • contribs)
- I created this page because I felt that 'Fire Challenge' met the WP:GNG due to its prevalence in RS. This makes me somewhat biased towards keeping; after all, I made the page. But if you want to nominate it for deletion, see WP:AFD. Tutelary (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- Nothing will keep terminally stupid people from self-selecting themselves out of the gene pool. 47.137.182.8 (talk) 01:50, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fire challenge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140811021114/http://www.whec.com/news/stories/S3522331.shtml to http://www.whec.com/news/stories/S3522331.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
"Supposedly" harmful nature? edit
Shouldn't that phrase read obviously harmful nature? What is supposed about the harm that will come from intentionally setting oneself on fire? 47.137.182.8 (talk) 01:48, 22 August 2018 (UTC)