Talk:FinanceWorks
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Vectro in topic Looks like a P.R. piece to me . . .
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2 January 2010. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Looks like a P.R. piece to me . . .
editSurely there are some drawbacks to using this business service. Also it would be nice to know something about its history, who developed it, the problems in rolling it out, etc. It is very unencyclopedic. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 20:15, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, it definitely looks like an advertisement. The whole article is just a bullet-point list of features and quotes. The tiny "Missing Features" section seems like a (less than halfhearted) attempt to appear neutral. And it's very out of date too, as several of those missing features have since been added. Unfortunately, I don't know nearly enough about FinanceWorks to redo the article myself. Rycr (talk) 18:48, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
- Note that the significant contributor to this article was digitalemi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who is now banned. Vectro (talk) 01:40, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
Yes - what about security? I stayed away from MINT for security access concerns. Is this better because it is business to business?