Talk:Festivali i Këngës 61/GA1

Latest comment: 8 months ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:08, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):  
    b. (citations to reliable sources):  
    c. (OR):  
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):  
    b. (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:  

(Criteria marked   are unassessed)

This is over 180 days old, so makes for a much useful review! --K. Peake 07:08, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead edit

  • Infobox looks good!
  • Are you sure Nostalgia Night isn't worthy of being mentioned by name here?
  • Move "with the song "Evita"" to the end of the sentence for more appropriate flow

Format edit

  • "on 19, 20 and 21 December" → "on the respective dates of 19, 20 and 21 December"

Voting structure edit

  • Looks good!

Contestants edit

  • Mention who published the list
  • The composers and lyricists are not sourced for the table
  • I was unable to find any reliable sources, therefore, I removed them. Iaof2017 (talk) 17:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Shows edit

Semi-finals edit

  • "and sharing her own" → "and share her own"
  • Tables look good!

Nostalgia Night edit

  • All looks good!

Final edit

  • Move "with the song "Evita"" to the end of the sentence for more appropriate flow
  • Table looks good!

Broadcasts edit

See also edit

  • Good

References edit

  • Copyvio score looks phenomenal at 9.1%!!!
  • Where is evidence of ref 11 having a proper editorial team?
    Replaced with a better source. Iaof2017 (talk) 14:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • ESC Beat → ESCBeat on ref 12 and what exactly makes this reliable?
    Removed. Iaof2017 (talk) 13:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Final comments and verdict edit

  •   On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this went nice and quickly! --K. Peake 08:07, 19 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Hey @Kyle Peake: hope you're well. Thank you for your effort and the review. I've resolved the issues and left some comments on a few. Iaof2017 (talk) 14:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
  •  Pass now, this is as expected! --K. Peake 18:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)Reply