Talk:Fernhill Park, Berkshire
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Another Believer in topic WP:POINTy addition of tags
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fernhill Park, Berkshire article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Berkshire may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
 | It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in England may be able to help! |
 | This article lacks an infobox. You may wish to add one, so that the article resembles the standard display for this subject. This talk page may contain the banner of a relevant project, that provides the standardized infobox for this type of article. See also Category:Infobox templates, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes. |
@Another Believer: A grade II listed building is considered a particularly important building of more than special interest. Your repeated addition of the {{notability}} by can be viewed as nothing short of WP:DE and edit warring. Please revert. Toddst1 (talk) 20:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Not until the article's prose mentions how the site is notable, or at least until appropriate categories are added. ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:55, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Grade II buildings are listed because they are important, as are buildings listed on the American National Register of Historic Places. They are not listed on either roster unless they are significant and being listing alone is significant coverage in a highly reliable third-party source. Toddst1 (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Right, so once the article demonstrates how the subject is notable, we can remove the tags. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- As someone supposedly interested in architecture, you should have known that any grade II building is notable and your repeated additions of that tag is not at all constructive. Toddst1 (talk) 21:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- I disagree, but let's both move on, shall we? Thanks, ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- As someone supposedly interested in architecture, you should have known that any grade II building is notable and your repeated additions of that tag is not at all constructive. Toddst1 (talk) 21:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Right, so once the article demonstrates how the subject is notable, we can remove the tags. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:06, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Grade II buildings are listed because they are important, as are buildings listed on the American National Register of Historic Places. They are not listed on either roster unless they are significant and being listing alone is significant coverage in a highly reliable third-party source. Toddst1 (talk) 21:01, 2 January 2018 (UTC)