Talk:Federalist No. 6/GA1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Thebiguglyalien in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: AryKun (talk · contribs) 11:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed
  • "The argument" maybe "This argument"?
  • "He also identifies...war-prone nations" Shouldn't the clause after the comma provide a contrast with the first clause here?
    • It doesn't use "but", "however", "although", etc
  • "Madison used a similar empiricist argument as Hamilton" maybe better as "Madison used an empiricist argument similar to Hamilton's"
  • Plot summary seems accurate from a reading of the original document.
  • Images are properly licensed and used.
  • References are reliable and properly formatted.
  • Spot-checks:
    • "Federalist Essays in Historic Newspapers". Library of Congress. Verifies all claims made.
    • Millican, Edward (2014). One United People: The Federalist Papers and the National Idea. University Press of Kentucky. pp. 79–80. Verifies all claims made.
    • "Federalist Papers: Primary Documents in American History". Library of Congress. Verifies all claims made.
  • That's all I have.

AryKun, all changes made except the one noted above. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)Reply