Talk:Federal crime in the United States

Should there be any section on what crimes the federal government is authorized to prosecute in the constittuion? § — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.174.193 (talk) 05:42, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

what crimes are considered federal crimes?

what are the usual penalties for committing a federal crime?

should minors at the age of 16 years or older, be able to tried as an adult and be punished in a federal prison for committing a federal crime?

con:

     1. minors would be very susceptible to things like rape in a federal prison, even at the age of 16 or higher

      2. should we be trying to give them moral guides instead to show what is right or wrong, instead of throwing them into jail.

      3. is this the wrong solution?

pro:

    1. would this make minors more responsible for their actions, and not want to do something like that again?

Why the globalize tag?

Is there a good reason why this article has the 'globalize' tag on it? Is the term "federal crime" used in other countries? Tempshill (talk) 22:19, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

It is in Germany and Austria AFAIK, and almost certainly elsewhere - an educated guess would be anywhere that is a Republic or Federation. Hohum (talk) 23:04, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

So the best solution might be to rename the article "Federal Crime in the United States" --75.47.100.27 (talk) 20:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Just as a nitpick: As a German, I have never heard of any German equivalent for "federal crime", so I don't think it's a term widely used in Germany. At any rate, in Germany almost all criminal law is federal law, so "federal crime" is usually an pleonasm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sleske (talk • contribs) 15:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

I'm a dual citizen of the United States of America and the Federal Republic of Germany and wondered about the why the globalize tag as well. Doesn't some of this allow for the reverse engineering of U.S. American Law? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.165.116.227 (talk) 01:38, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Reverting referenced content

If an editor reverts an edit that provides references, especially where there were none, then that editor needs to give reasoning and not list it as a minor edit. Otr500 (talk) 04:46, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Federal crime in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161224230522/https://www2.fbi.gov/hq/cid/arttheft/legislation.htm to https://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/arttheft/legislation.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Richard Jewell

What about Richard Jewell? They destroyed him when he actually was a hero. 2601:196:8500:10E0:7CF2:46C5:8D00:822E (talk) 22:16, 2 December 2022 (UTC)