Talk:Facebook diplomacy

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Gusfriend in topic Needs updating

Challenge against Speedy Deletion edit

The Facebook diplomacy page should not be deleted. I User:Problemsmith have researched public diplomacy for some time and researched over 12 bona-fide articles that mention "Facebook diplomacy" there are over 6 articles already cited therein including one from Newsweek where Facebook diplomacy is in the title.

I have additional articles that will be included and plan to add to the article, but the article has enough good references currently for publication on Wikipedia.

If the article title is not permitted I will agree to move it and re-title it that is, IF IT VIOLATES Policy or Wikipwdia best practice. If I were to move it I would move it to social network diplomacy but actually it is a real form of diplomacy style that has been made possible by the semi-private platform developments of Facebook, however the Facebook company is not a protagonist in the article, diplomacy is. Problemsmith 07:56, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Its a good article on international relations using Facebook edit

Looks like the article, it can use more references and work but I do not believe it should be deleted and appears to fit in multiple categories and should be picked up by two or more Wiki Projects. I will add categories to it and remove the {{db-test]] tag because it clearly does not fall under CSD G2 criteria for deletion. I think I will also recommend this article to some students at USC Center on Public Diplomacy to take this on as a project or contribute to its further elaboration. I am not sure if it should be retitled and moved considering the references. As an article it qualifies as an un-assessed article and should be categorized under diplomacy and social networking. I will look at the article again later to see if it needs to be re-tagged for any other reason and contact the author. Ingenosa (talk) 10:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Other Article Titles Suggested edit

I am unsure of international laws on copyright use of the Facebook name in this term or as to whether Facebook is a place or a company now, it appears in this article as to Facebook being a place. If someone insists the title should be changed, other titles that may be appropriate for this one are digital diplomacy, e-diplomacy, or social network diplomacy because they all appear as one in the same relative to some eleven other articles visible in the hard copy print news and in various website news articles. Reference to public diplomacy 2.0 should probably be considered as well.Ingenosa (talk) 10:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

All the title suggestions are the same edit

I am not a Wikipedia editor but I saw this article this morning and see it has been challenged, I work on Facebook and throughout the social networking world as one of the ambassadors being referred to and concur that digital diplomacy, e-diplomacy, and social network diplomacy are the same and that internet diplomacy is a valid term also, but references are clear that it was started on facebook. § —Preceding unsigned comment added by Boffin1157 (talkcontribs) 10:45, 6 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Renaming the page to Digital Diplomacy edit

I suggest this page should be renamed to Digital Diplomacy and be merged with eDiplomacy. Facebook_diplomacy, Google Diplomacy, Twitter Diplomacy (or Twiplomacy) and Citizen_diplomacy should be just sub categories. PS.: I might be biased (I am the author of the Twiplomacy study on the use of Twitter by heads of state and government and diplomats. http://twiplomacy.com) Any volunteers? Thanks Lufkens (talk) 09:17, 13 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Facebook diplomacy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:55, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Needs updating edit

I added the tag as the references and text are from several years ago. Given the change in social media in that time the page should be updated to include those changes. Perhaps even talking about use by state and state sponsored actors.~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gusfriend (talkcontribs) 09:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply