Talk:FOB (shipping)/Archives/2016

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Freight On Board

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm struggling to find any reference to anywhere that this is a correct usage, and not just somebody mis-hearing "Free On Board". The only reference I can find online for a definition is to UCC § 2-319, but that only defines "Free on Board".

https://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2/2-319

I also found this court case which is pretty clear that Freight On Board is not an industry term in the US.

http://www.cit.uscourts.gov/SlipOpinions/Slip_op00/00-53.pdf

So assuming nobody objects in the next few days I will change this article to explain that Freight On Board doesn't mean anything, and the correct term is always Free On Board.

JN5556649 (talk) 22:58, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on FOB (shipping). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140503073919/http://pntodd.users.netlink.co.uk:80/cases/cases_p/pyrene.htm to http://pntodd.users.netlink.co.uk/cases/cases_p/pyrene.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 28 December 2016 (UTC)