Talk:Extended producer responsibility

--Alex 15:39, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Untitled

The article seems to stray from neutrality in its choice of words.

Some of the word choices in the article seem unnecessarily biasing. Such as "Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is a strategy" and "Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) uses political means" or "This tactic attempts..." even "The producer may also choose to delegate this responsibility to a third party, a so-called producer responsibility organization (PRO), which is paid by the producer for spent-product management."

While it is true that EPR uses these methods, EPR itself is not its methods. EPR is a concept wherein companies are held responsible past the point of sale (extended) and is based in the belief that companies are responsible for the entire life cycle of their products.

Also, the discussion of "consumer responsibility" and CO2 should be in a different section as it is not part of the definition of EPR. Rather, it is a criticism of EPR and perhaps should be in a "criticism" sub-section.

Gwaz (talk) 23:58, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

I agree that much of the language in this article is unnecessarily biased. I've begun to make some changes to improve the wording, but major reorganization may be necessary. --Efchambe (talk) 01:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mizeilleavina. Peer reviewers: Mizeilleavina.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:03, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Extended producer responsibility. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120310194722/http://www.ilsr.org/recycling/epr/index.html to http://www.ilsr.org/recycling/epr/index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081201111452/http://www.sierraclub.org/committees/zerowaste/producerresponsibility/index.asp to http://www.sierraclub.org/committees/zerowaste/producerresponsibility/index.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100806123116/http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/partnerships/stewardship/basic.htm to http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/partnerships/stewardship/basic.htm
• Added archive https://archive.is/20070812124841/http://72.10.40.168/commentaries/scarlett_20001004.shtml to http://72.10.40.168/commentaries/scarlett_20001004.shtml
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.iioa.org/pdf/Intermediate-2006/Full%20paper_Lennox.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:48, 26 September 2017 (UTC)