Talk:Everybody's Fool/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 12:52, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "F Major" -> "F major"  Done

   "She also portrays an extreme motorcycle girl in a commercial who drinks a soft drink called "Lies" that affords its drinker the opportunity to "Be somebody."[14]" - what does "extreme" means? Is this POV?  Done

   "In another Japanese commercial she is playing " - not sure why you switched to simple present  Done

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References are ok, but could you replace the Amazon refs with another, more reliable?

    Not done Amazon is reliable.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   see above about "extreme"

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• Dabsolver check: ok
• Checklinks check: ok
• Reflinks check: ok
• Fixed dashes
• All in all a very nice article
  • Hold and I will pass if you fix the issues.

Everything  Done. My love is love (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Ok, I will pass! Very nice article! :)