Talk:Ethiopian historiography/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by PericlesofAthens in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 17:01, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 17:01, 27 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I just noticed this nomination. Based on my earlier involvement with Ethiopian articles, I'd like to offer some suggestions on content to help improve this article -- which otherwise IMHO is very close to GA status. -- llywrch (talk) 07:12, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

You're certainly free to make suggestions. I'll pay heed to anyone's advice if it will help to improve this article. Just bear in mind that it is @Iazyges: who is the one reviewing the article, though. --Pericles of AthensTalk 15:44, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Criteria

edit
GA Criteria

GA Criteria:

  • 1
    1.a  Y
    1.b  Y
  • 2
    2.a  Y
    2.b  Y
    2.c  Y
    2.d  Y
  • 3
    3.a  Y
    3.b  Y
  • 4
    4.a  Y
  • 5
    5.a  Y
  • 6
    6.a  Y
    6.b  Y
  • No DAB links  N: "Iranians" is a dab link.
  • No Dead links  Y
  • Images appropriately licensed  Y
@Iazyges:I fixed the "Iranians" link by pipe-linking it to Iranian peoples. Thanks for pointing it out! Pericles of AthensTalk 06:15, 28 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Prose Suggestions

edit
  • "their lost overseas territories in Arabia as part of their realm." perhaps "their lost Arabian territories as part of their realm", unless you've done this intentionally to avoid confusion with modern day Saudi Arabia/Arab world, since the concept didn't exist back then.
  • I couldn't find anymore issues with prose; get any better at prose, and you'll put me out a job! -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 22:29, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hah! I'll try not to have you lose your job here! Lol. I fixed the sentence according to your suggestion. I'm glad you liked the article! --Pericles of AthensTalk 23:55, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply