Talk:Ethanol fuel in Brazil/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Pyrotec in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA review.Pyrotec (talk) 16:22, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA review

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A comprehensive, wide-ranging, well referenced and well illustrated article.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
    Very well illustrated.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

This is quite a long article, so my review took some time do. This is an outstanding GA; my only comment is that you are possibly a bit over enthusiastic about linking, aldehyde for example only "needs" (it may not need any) a maximum of one link in a section, not one link per subsection. Note: aldehyde is a poor example, "hydrated" was far worse, but its the last one I changed.

I suggest that you consider WP:FAC next.

I'm awarding GA-class, it is richly deserved.Pyrotec (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2009 (UTC)Reply