Talk:Entrada (Fringe)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Grapple X (talk · contribs) 02:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Why does this feel familiar?

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   The review from Time seems to contain a few errors ("since its committed to", inconsistent italics, and some iffy grammar) - perhaps it's best to tag the quote with {{sic}} to prevent hypercorrection here.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   No problems here.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Scope is grand. If you can come across some filming details they'd be lovely but it's fine as is.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutrality's good.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Sole image is used appropriately and is a free file. No problems there then/

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Quick pass for this one. Nothing new there! Well done again. GRAPPLE X 02:54, 16 December 2011 (UTC)