Talk:Entoloma austroprunicolor/GA1
Latest comment: 10 years ago by J Milburn in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: J Milburn (talk · contribs) 18:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
I remember seeing this one at FPC. Nice looking article.
- "(haven a central rounded elevation resembling a nipple)" I assume you mean "having"?
- I'm not sure the link to adnation is useful, especially as it doesn't say anything about fungi
- "stipe measures 3–7.5 cm (1.2–3.0 in) tall and" Long?
- "cortex" Jargon
- "contain granules that contain" Repetition
- "and has different microscopic features.[3]" Seeing as it's a short section, perhaps you could expand on these features?
- Just a thought, and there may not be much you can expand upon here, but if it's common, why was it only described so recently?
I made a few small edits. A literature search threw up nothing you'd missed- clearly not a species that's been written about much, but there's certainly enough here for GA status. J Milburn (talk) 18:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks very much! Sasata (talk) 20:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Happy with the fixes, and thanks for the clarification about why this was such a recent discovery. I'm going to go ahead and promote now- not the biggest or most exciting article, but seems to accurately reflect what has been published about this species. J Milburn (talk) 10:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)