Talk:En Primera Fila/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mdann52 (talk · contribs) 17:25, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

I feel that this is a clear pass, as it meets the GA criteria very well.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   The lead gives a good overview on the article. It lacks source, however, the rest of the sourced content backs it up. No problems with any grammar/spellings in the prose, and sections are appropriate and relevent.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Overall, referencing appears ok, however, I am slightly doubtful about the reliability of the album cover notes, but I feel that enough notibility is shown elsewhere.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   As well as giving facts about the article, it gives the background and other accociated information about the article.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   No means of leaving a NPOV are in there.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Nothing shows up as an edit war recently, if at all.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images are appropriate, and tagged accordingly.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Clear pass, Good work!