Talk:Empowerment and Rights Institute
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Oiyarbepsy in topic POV TAG
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://www.erichina.org. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2007082410007608. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 28 January 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
POV TAG edit
I'm doing POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 18:25, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
- @Jjdon: Well, it's written like an ad. I just tagged it as such, but I will also start working on cleaning it up. Unless of course I decide that this group isn't notable and should be deleted. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC)