Talk:Elihu Club/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elihu (secret society). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:52, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Elihu (secret society). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Comment

The article on Job points back here, can we get an article on the biblical Elihu? Instead of only one of a reference to him - it seems a bit like a shadow on a cave wall.

The article claims, "The club's three-story white clapboard house is the oldest of all society buildings", but gives no date. Wolf's Head (Wolf's_Head_(secret_society)) is 1920s, Scroll and Key (Scroll_and_Key) is 1869, Book and Snake (Book_and_snake) is 1901, Berzelius (Berzelius) is unspecified, and Skull and Bones is unspecified but several online sources give it as 1856 (Google Search). Highly unlikely that Elihu upper part is older than all of these.

Some of the more prominent members listed in the article are, in fact, honorary members. I suspect they didn't know their names would turn up an encyclopedia article back when they accepted a private Club's invitation. Would the editor who added these folks consider removing them or at least confirming that these private citizens have publicly declared their membership, as some of the more famous public individuals listed have done (e.g., Jackson-Lee)?

3/21/07 Yes, thanks for the question above. As an actual Federal-era (1780-1830) building, which sits on a below-grade foundation that pre-dates the American Revolution, on historic New Haven Green, we can safely say that for both its foundation and its above-ground structure, this secret society is in the oldest building used for such a purpose at Yale. My entry (I was the author) did not assert that it was the oldest society to have been founded, I said it is the "oldest of all society buildings".BoolaBoola2

"Outing members"

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Few individuals who joined a Yale society thought a mention in a Wikipedia entry was part of the regimen; however, if the identities of "Notable" members were kept "secret", the bullshit notion that Yale societies are plotting to take over the Executive branch of the U.S. government, and eat every piece of pecan piece baked in Louisiana, would merit a book. The W.H.S. entry has given me pause on the question who should be mentioned. One day the "Notable" section will be trimmed to 15, then maybe just the Pulitzer Prize winners and Senators. The fact that the memberships include winners in the realms of politics and the arts confirm the worth of the enterprise, and the notion that merit is remarkable. If any alum takes offense, no offense was intended. In this light, I suggest the other society entries use the W.H.S. entry as a model, to the letter, when listing a notable. Do some research, and include the research.SLY111 05:27, 28 April 2007 (UTC)SLY111 Geez...at least include the Notable's delegation year.65.88.88.126 (talk) 16:36, 11 September 2009 (UTC)SLY111

The delegation years will be added. MarmadukePercy (talk) 02:36, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

There isn't one footnote substantiating membership. 127W111 (talk) 22:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Kerry, Lieberman

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Will they be uniting in Kerry's new position? Perhaps a section with a focus on current leadership would be in order.--Wikipietime (talk) 14:53, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Link is irrelevant to women at Elihu

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There's poor or misleading footnote and link in entry regarding "minority" women and Elihu. Suggest removing text and link. 127W111 (talk) 16:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC)