Talk:Electoral boundary delimitation

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 45.215.254.105 in topic Civic

Wrong focus

edit

This article spends too much space talking about various bodies recommendations for how redistricting (or whatever you want to call it) ought to be accomplished and almost nothing on how it actually is done -- which should be the primary focus. 121a0012 (talk) 02:27, 22 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Boundary delimitation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:59, 24 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Civic

edit

Electral processes in zambia 45.215.254.105 (talk) 21:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)Reply