Talk:Eisenhower Tunnel/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments

• Remember to state that it is the United States.
• The lead states it is among the last parts of the Interstate to be completed, but doesn't say which year.
• Perhaps mention the number of lanes in the lead.
• I think you are doing a number of that/which errors—check out the rules, they confuse even me, and I wasn't aware of it until a featured nomination of mine. Those types of errors are beyond the scope of GA.
• When writing in past tense, use "were" instead of "would be".
• When converting currency, don't say "today", say "as of [year]".
• Ref 3 needs a title.

Nice, well-written and interesting article. Some small things, so I'm placing it on hold. Arsenikk ^(talk) 21:58, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. I will try to get to these this weekend. Dave (talk) 17:33, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Arsenikk, can you specify what types of errors are found in the article and how they could be fixed? Thanks. --Pzoxicuvybtnrm 22:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Arsenikk, thank you for the review and kind words. I believe between Pz and my fixes we have fixed everything you have noted. I also am not skilled with grammar; however, I have noted the overuse of the word that and which. I have removed/fixed some instances. Please advise if you find any more issues. Thanks again. Dave (talk) 06:58, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Pz: the list was complete for all the non-good things I found. All in all, above average for a GA nomination. By the way, I may have faulted in the currency thing, if you are using {{inflation}}, then it is okay to use that syntax (I was at the time not aware of this automatic process). Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 08:20, 6 April 2010 (UTC)