Talk:Ed Blake/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: maclean (talk) 18:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see Wikipedia:What is a good article?)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Few copyedits made [1]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Uses Baseball-Reference.com, The Sporting News, a local newspaper, retrosheet.org, and baseballinwartime.co.uk

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

5. It is stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   No images used.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Thanks :) Guess I'm getting better at writing if it was able to be passed without a hold. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 19:47, 10 January 2010 (UTC)