Potential sources edit

(there's more) NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:07, 2 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Compose article in draft first? edit

@NewsAndEventsGuy: - Ecological grief is a notable topic, but it is difficult to evaluate the article and provide feedback as you requested when the article consists of one sentence. We tell fledgling editors to compose a new article in draft first, solicit feedback, and then—when it the article is truly ready for prime time—publish it on Wikipedia. Should those of us who've been around for a while not do the same? This is not a big concern for me, I'm simply asking the question. Plus, given your experience and output, this might be a B-class article next week. ;-) All the best   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I am a man. The traditional male pronouns are fine.) 21:14, 12 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

@NewsAndEventsGuy:, @Markworthen: My take on "WP:BE BOLD" is that lots of citations in a stub lets the citations tell the story. I'll add a few more of the talk page cites, and turn it over to you for the article text. If you're more comfortable writing in draft space or a sandbox, that's fine with me. Oliveleaf4 (talk) 14:50, 25 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
That's a very good point Oliveleaf4 that I had not thought of before. Therefore, no need for a sandbox draft version (now that I have been enlightened ;0). Thanks!   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) (I am a man. The traditional male pronouns are fine.) 15:13, 25 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Loss edit

There is abundant literature on loss and perceived (presumption of) loss among various populations. Young persons may more acutely sense the risk of loss of quality of life and seek to blame others for that sense of diminished possibilities (that toxic environments - from pollution - and shifting geographies - sea levels rising, thermal shifts, melting ice, climate change in general - may imply or suggest). Wherever that literate on 'loss' has been incorporated into its professional repertoire (counseling, clergy, social work, public health, economic and political planning, religion and ministry, etc.), maybe 'best practices' addresses that type of shifting horizon of expectations, dramatic anxiety vs. Angst, etc. One need not become 'a total fatalist' in order to sense that the cumulative future is not as good as it might have been, but has 'the future' EVER been 'as good as it might have been'? MaynardClark (talk) 20:55, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Lots of references here edit

https://libraryguides.lanecc.edu/climateactivism/grief?fbclid=IwAR0EPEVP9EC3sS1C0o-3JNZfnJs22_t6BqFEivljInmk0x72R3ZRrgDS0_M

John Cummings (talk) 18:32, 27 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Another reference edit

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/feb/10/overwhelming-and-terrifying-impact-of-climate-crisis-on-mental-health

John Cummings (talk) 12:03, 10 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

And more here edit

John Cummings (talk) 21:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education assignment: Conservation Biology edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 1 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cat241912 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Datotter007.

— Assignment last updated by Otter246 (talk) 22:12, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply