Talk:Ebbw Valley Railway/GA1
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 21:55, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 21:55, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Inital comments
editThis looks to be quite a reasonable article that should make GA this time around.
I have a few minor comments and at this stage I'm mostly going to highlight "problems". I'm leaving the WP:Lead until last; otherwise, if I don't make a comment here about a particular section that probably means that I regard it as being OK. I will provide an overall summary at the end. Pyrotec (talk) 16:56, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- History -
- Ref 5 (Daniels & Dench 1973) is a book, so you aught to provide a page number, or numbers, such as in refs 9 and 10.
.... to be continued. Pyrotec (talk) 17:01, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
This article is clearly about the post-Beaching line. Its history under GWR and BR represents about three quarters of one paragraph.
No further comments.
Overall sumary
editGA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
A comprehensive article on a post-Beaching railway line.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- Well referenced.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- Well referenced.
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Well referenced.
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Well referenced.
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Congratulations on producing a fine article. I'm awarding it GA-status. Pyrotec (talk) 20:16, 3 September 2010 (UTC)