Talk:ELKI/Archive 1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Chire in topic Group relevancy
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Comment
Albeit this is rather new research and development, it is (apart from the given publications) independently mentioned e.g. in:
- Müller, E. and Assent, I. and Günnemann, S. and Jansen, T. and Seidl, T. (2009). "OpenSubspace: an open source framework for evaluation and exploration of subspace clustering algorithms in WEKA". Proc. Open Source in Data Mining workshop (OSDM'09) at Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining,.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: extra punctuation (link) CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.246.7.176 (talk) 14:22, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
- That reference is the only independent reference found by a Google Scholar search for the article title. Looking at that reference, ELKI is certainly mentioned, but i'm not sure it's enough to consitute significant coverage. Qwfp (talk) 21:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Group relevancy
FWIW, the database systems group is independently evaluated as one of the most cited database research groups:
- E. Rahm, A. Thor (2005). "Citation analysis of database publications" (PDF). SIGMOD Record. 34 (4). Retrieved 2010-05-10.
{{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter|comment=ignored (help); Unknown parameter|published=ignored (help)
but I would not include this reference in the article, because IMHO it is overly advertising, and doesn't actually refer to the ELKI software, but to the group. However, I see little point in having an article on the research group itself (where ELKI could then be merged). --Chire (talk) 12:36, 30 May 2010 (UTC)