Talk:EHang

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Marketing Nonsense edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is this bit in the description of an upcoming model, "its payload is four times as much as that of Amazon Prime Air UAV". Until this future product is actually introduced to the market, it is premature to say what it will actually be capable of doing. I am deleting this.DevRockinAZ (talk) 13:48, 24 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Probably SCAM edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

All videos of this thing flying are a mixture of downscaled models and CGI graphics. Nobody has ever registered an actual size version flying. Moreover, their promise to deploy several units as self-flying taxis this past summer hasn't been accomplished, or at least no single relevant media outlet has witnessed them.

I've removed the "Status: In service" and "First flight: 2014" claims, because there's no single proof to support them. I suggest to keep it that way until someone can provide reliable evidence of this being a real thing, instead of the hype to lure naive investors it actually looks like. 87.125.140.194 (talk) 13:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

While third-party reports are essential, more recordings have been produced by the company purporting to show folks associated with the project riding in the vehicle- here's a promo: https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/5/16974310/ehang-passenger-carrying-drone-first-test-flight

As is, the article here contains a number of gross factual errors that need address.Mavigogun (talk) 17:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic