Talk:Dynamic stall

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Ahunt in topic Merger w/ stall delay?

Nonsense

edit

This artical makes no sense. No pictures where they are reference to and confusing layount. I think someone has copied and pasted it straight into it from a project. Clean up needed.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Citizenthom (talkcontribs) 12:13, 8 June 2007

Sense

edit

Makes perfect sense to me. Even has grammar, unlike the comment above. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.63.133.36 (talk) 18:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merger w/ stall delay?

edit

I just found there's a similar article, stall delay. Possibly it is better to merge them together. --Dynamicsoar (talk) 13:29, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Actually in looking over that article and this one I think they both should be merged into Stall (flight). - Ahunt (talk) 15:03, 16 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
I agree they should both go into Stall (flight). Dynamic stall and Stall delay are presented in Wikipedia as being the same. They are not sufficiently distinctive to warrant an article separate from Stall (flight). Dolphin (t) 02:02, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
Okay I think we have sufficient consensus to do that, so I have merged the content of both articles to Stall (flight). - Ahunt (talk) 19:07, 19 March 2011 (UTC)Reply