Talk:Dylan and Cole Sprouse/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   The prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct, this article complies with Wikipedia's Manual of Style.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   See notes below. The sources here are fine (But I have doubts to "Gossip Center.com") and this contains no original research.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   See notes below. This article is quite focused on the subject.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   It all seemed preety fair to me.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   I can see that the page is stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All the images are tagged and there are no non-free images, see notes below for point b.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   – Plarem ^{(User talk contribs)} 14:58, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Comments

• For point Number six, the note is that the current picture of them could be a bit newer, but that is only a proposition.
• The end of Dylan and Cole Sprouse#Acting may leave the reader wanting more, as to what are they doing now, because this ends at 2010.
• I will leave a citation needed tag where references are needed. ()

FAIL – I have assessed the article and left recommendations, but noone can find what are they doint now and find the citations that are needed in 5 days. I am sorry to say that I have failed this article, Tough luck lads... – Plarem ^{(User talk contribs)} 15:21, 6 September 2011 (UTC)