Creator seems to be moving stuff out of the Dusty Springfield article. Dlohcierekim Deleted? 23:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Moving stuff out of Dusty Springfield
editHello, that's right, I am shortening Dusty article, to bring it to at least the vicinity of Wikipedia guidelines criteria of article size. Before, there was no way, anybody would read through all of Dusty Springfield article. Most of the extensive research was not sourced, which was pointed out in the article and ruined the overall impression. Look, I know, that it is not common to make a separate page about someone's sexuality. I'd say, a great exception should be made for Dusty Springfield, because, concerning sexuality, she is among the most discussed people in that topic. There is more than enough material covering the issue of Dusty Springfield's sexuality, than ever needed to make a good article. Many editors are here, contributing to Dusty Springfield article, because she was a lesbian icon. It was not an issue in her early life 1970, which was the prime time of her career. So it is not worth more than two paragraphs in the main article. I've created unlimited space to provide information about the issue. Thank you. User:Erikupoeg